indialegallive

The Delhi High Court has refused to grant regular bail to a man accused of procuring classified military documents and facilitating their alleged transmission to an official of the Pakistan High Commission, holding that the prosecution material warranted continued judicial scrutiny in view of the sensitive nature of the information involved. Justice Sanjeev Narula dismissed [] The post Delhi High Court denies bail to man accused of transmitting classified military documents to Pakistan appeared

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar had condemned Mahatma Gandhis assassination and, despite disagreeing with some of Gandhis political views, did not want him killed, Satyaki Savarkar, the Hindutva ideologues grandnephew, told a special MP/MLA court in Pune during cross-examination in a criminal defamation case against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi. Satyaki made the statement while being questioned by [] The post Savarkar opposed Gandhis assassination, grandnephew tells Pune Court during Rahul Gandhi defam

The Patna High Court has held former Lok Sabha Speaker Meira Kumar entitled to compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, for land acquired by the Bihar government in 1976, ruling that the Collector lacked jurisdiction to cancel the lands revenue records without establishing that [] The post Patna High Court sets aside cancellation of Meira Kumars land records, holds her entitled to compensation under 2013 Ac

AISA president Neha Bora on Thursday defended the call for regime change as a legitimate expression of democratic dissent before the Delhi High Court, which was hearing her challenge to preventive proceedings initiated by the Delhi Police following protests against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Appearing for Bora, senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan submitted that advocating [] The post Call for regime change not unlawful in a democracy: Neha Bora tells Delhi High Court appeared

The Bombay High Court on Thursday allowed a petitioner to withdraw his challenge to the constitutional validity of Maharashtras anti-conversion legislation after the Court questioned the absence of specific facts demonstrating how the law had adversely affected him. A Division Bench of Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna was hearing a writ [] The post Bombay High Court permits withdrawal of challenge to Maharashtra Anti-Conversion Act; fresh petition allowed appeared