indialegallive
Elections 2026Football / indialegallive
The Delhi High Court sought a response from the Delhi Police and Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Parvesh Verma on a petition alleging that Verma assaulted Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) worker Sahib Singh during an inspection of road construction works in West Delhi on September 27. Justice Sachin Datta directed the Delhi Police to place a [] The post Delhi High Court seeks police response on AAP workers plea alleging assault by Parvesh Verma appeared first on India Legal .
The Delhi High Court on Thursday has agreed to hear a plea by the Indian Youth Congress (IYC) challenging the denial of permission to hold a protest against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar at Jantar Mantar. Simultaneously, another fresh petition has been filed before the Supreme Court questioning the appointments of Kumar as CEC and [] The post Plea against denial of permission for Jantar Mantar protest to be heard tomorrow in Delhi HC; another petition challenging appointments of CEC,
The Delhi High Court has issued summons on a suit filed by actor and BJP MP Kangana Ranaut seeking protection of her personality and privacy rights against the alleged circulation of obscene and pornographic content, including material purportedly generated using artificial intelligence. Justice Vikas Mahajan also issued notice on Ranauts application seeking interim relief in [] The post Delhi High Court issues summons on Kangana Ranauts plea against obscene AI-generated content appeared first o
The Supreme Court has directed the Centre to consider constituting a committee to examine the practice of pharmaceutical companies offering gifts, incentives and other benefits to doctors to influence the prescription of their medicines. A bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta was dealing with concerns over the existing regulatory framework governing pharmaceutical [] The post Supreme Court asks Centre to set up panel to examine pharma companies offering freebies to doctors for
The Supreme Court has sharply criticised the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) over the alleged neglect and poor upkeep of several historic monuments in the national capital, observing that the heritage agency had lost credibility after monuments were found being used for purposes wholly inconsistent with their protected [] The post ASI has lost credibility: Supreme Court raps heritage body after Lodhi-era monument found used as cow shed, dumping y
The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to interfere with the Calcutta High Courts order granting interim bail to Congress candidate Milan Pradhan in six criminal cases to enable him to contest the Nandigram Assembly bypoll and participate in the counting process. A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice [] The post Nandigram bypoll: Supreme Court declines to intervene in Congress candidate Milan Pradhans interim bail appeared first on India Legal
Delhi High Court Justice Prateek Jalan on Wednesday recused himself from hearing a plea filed by the Delhi Gymkhana Club Staff Welfare Association challenging the Central governments move to evict the club from its 27.3-acre premises in Lutyens Delhi. Citing his membership in the club, Justice Jalan recused himself from the matter, stating he would [] The post Delhi High Court judge Justice Prateek Jalan recuses from hearing Delhi Gymkhana Club eviction plea appeared first on India Legal .
The Delhi High Court has directed the authorities to take a decision within six months on framing a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) governing the operation and use of body-worn cameras by police personnel, including the storage and handling of recorded data. A Division Bench of Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Sanjay Sharma were hearing [] The post Delhi High Court asks authorities to decide within six months on SOP for police body-worn cameras appeared first on India Legal .
The Supreme Court has held that High Courts should not make sweeping observations suggesting that custodial interrogation of an accused is necessary while deciding an anticipatory bail plea, observing that the nature and manner of interrogation should be left to the investigating agency. A bench comprising Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice Atul S Chandurkar made [] The post Supreme Court: High Court should not suggest custodial interrogation is necessary while deciding anticipatory bail appeared

23 C