SC modifies its order, stays strictures passed by Allahabad HC against Noida DM
The Supreme Court modified its interim order regarding Noida District Magistrate Medha Roopam's actions. It stayed the Allahabad High Court's strictures and compensation directive related to the unlawful detention of Akriti Chaudhary. The Supreme Court's order prevents recovery of the Rs 5 lakh compensation from Roopam's salary until further hearing. In an earlier decision, the High Court quashed Chaudhary's detention under the National Security Act.
Can banks recover loans from life insurance payouts? Allahabad HC weighs in
Allahabad HC asked SBI to refund 17.29 lakh deducted from a widow's account to recover her deceased husband's loan, saying the bank was prima facie not entitled to recover it from insurance proceeds
The Allahabad High Court has warned a workplace against forcing employees to wear Santa Claus red caps, observing that such instructions could hurt the sentiments of people belonging to different faiths and disturb a peaceful and harmonious work environment, as reported by LawBeat. The court also set aside the summoning order issued against an employee [] The post Hurting Sentiments Of Different Faiths: Allahabad High Court Warns Workplace Against Forcing Employees To Wear Santa Caps appeared first on The Commune .
Drunk man stabs son to death for not studying, using cellphone
From Moonj crafts to samosas, Prayagraj entrepreneurs eye global showcase
Prayagraj STF arrests wanted murder suspect after 13 months
Railways announces 3 spl festive trains via Prayagraj Chheoki
HC: Change of religion does not automatically end ST status
HC acquits woman sentenced to death for killing her three kids
SC stays Allahabad HC order quashing students NSA detention
Digital Desk | New Delhi, Sep 23 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed the operation of the Allahabad High Court judgment, directing the recovery of Rs 5 lakh compensation from the salary of the Gautam Buddha Nagar District Magistrate and other officials for student activist Akriti Chaudhary's detention under the National Security Act (NSA). The apex court also stayed the High Court order, which quashed the student's detention under the NSA. A Bench of Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and NK Singh passed the interim order while hearing separate petitions filed by Gautam Buddha Nagar District Magistrate Medha Roopam and the Uttar Pradesh government challenging the judgment of the Allahabad High Court. The apex court granted permission to file the special leave petition (SLP) in the matter filed by Medha Roopam and issued notice to Akriti Chaudhary and other respondents. It also issued notice in the petition filed by the Uttar Pradesh government and other officials. Senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for Chaudhary, accepted notice on her behalf. The respondents were granted two weeks' time to file their replies. After hearing senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi, Colin Gonsalves and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on the question of interim relief, the Supreme Court ordered that the operation of the impugned judgment, particularly paragraphs 27 to 33, will remain stayed until the matter is heard on merits. The Justice Sharma-led Bench posted both matters for further hearing on October 7, 2026. The Allahabad High Court, in its judgment passed on September 2, had allowed the habeas corpus petition filed by Chaudhary and held that her continued incarceration under the NSA was violative of her rights under Article 21. It directed that Chaudhary be set at liberty if she was not wanted in any other case and ordered payment of Rs 5 lakh compensation, to be recovered from the salary of the District Magistrate, Gautam Buddha Nagar, as well as other officials found responsible, ight down to the SHO of the Police Station who had prepared the initial report leading to her detention. The case arose from labour unrest in Gautam Buddha Nagar in April 2026, when workers protested over low wages, long working hours and inadequate pay. The Uttar Pradesh government had claimed that Chaudhary acted as an agent provocateur and that her activities and dissemination of information contributed to violence that erupted from April 13. However, Chaudhary had contended that the proceedings against her were an attempt to stifle her freedom of speech and expression and that there was no material warranting her detention under the stringent provisions of the NSA. The High Court observed that the alleged violence had commenced only after Chaudhary was taken into custody. It also examined WhatsApp conversations and stated that the state government had failed to identify a single message or video clip showing that she had incited violence or disclosed any conspiracy to provoke rioting, arson or destruction of property. The High Court further observed that the videos relied upon by the authorities showed people gathered peacefully and did not indicate that the crowd was armed or agitated. Any detention under the NSA is an exception. It is not a substitute to ensure that a person who may receive bail on account of merits of his case is still detained in custody under a concocted reasoning by the State, the High Court had said. It had also held that the grounds of detention were repetitive, speculative and are only opinion-based and lacked supporting material for the District Magistrate's conclusions. The High Court further observed that a notice issued under Section 130 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) appeared to have been prepared after Chaudhary's arrest, describing the procedure as ex post facto the arrest and nothing more than a sham. On the compensation issue, the High Court had criticised the conduct of the Gautam Buddha Nagar District Magistrate and observed that the officer was expected to carefully examine the material before invoking the NSA against a female student activist. It had said the conduct of the District Magistrate was worthy of derision and held that the officer had desired to set an example out of the petitioner and deter others from exercising their right to freedom of speech and expression in public spaces in support of the labourers. The High Court had further observed that the District Magistrate was guilty of violating his oath of allegiance and held that the case warranted compensation. It had also stressed that peaceful agitation is protected by the Constitution and compared the role of protests to a safety valve in a pressure cooker, helping release accumulated public grievances rather than allowing them to build up to a point where violence becomes inevitable.
SC Stays Rs 5 Lakh Compensation Order Against Noida DM Medha Roopam, CEC Gyanesh Kumar's Daughter
The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed the Allahabad High Court's order requiring Gautam Buddh Nagar District Magistrate Medha Roopam to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation from her salary over the detention of student Akriti Chaudhary under the NSA. A
SC stays HC order asking Noida DM to compensate student
The Supreme Court has stayed an Allahabad High Court order that directed Gautam Buddh Nagar District Magistrate Medha Roopam to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation from her salary for the detention of student Akriti Chaudhary under the National Security Act (NSA). The High Court had quashed Chaudhary's detention, criticising the DM's conduct and ordering compensation. The Supreme Court issued notice on pleas from Roopam and the Uttar Pradesh government, also staying the High Court's observations against the DM, with further hearing scheduled for October 7.
Noida District Magistrate Gets Relief, Supreme Court Pauses Rs 5 Lakh Compensation
The Allahabad High Court had directed Noida DM Medha Roopam to pay a compensation of Rs 5 lakh from her salary to the student activist.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed the Allahabad High Court's order directing Gautam Buddh Nagar District Magistrate Medha Roopam to pay Rs 5 lakh from her salary as compensation to student-activist Akriti Chaudhary, who was...
SC reserves order on Noida DM Medha Roopam's plea against Rs 5 lakh recovery in NSA case
The Supreme Court has reserved its order regarding Gautam Buddha Nagar District Magistrate Medha Roopam's plea. Roopam's plea challenges the Allahabad High Court's ruling that quashed student activist Akriti Chaudhary's NSA detention. The High Court also mandated compensation to Chaudhary to be deducted from Roopam's salary. Senior advocates presented conflicting arguments on the legality of Chaudhary's detention and the handling of proceedings.
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court on Tuesday, September 22, freed a Ghaziabad woman from her fathers custody and allowed her to live with her Muslim husband. Justice Sandeep Jain ordered the release of 26-year-old Sonika Chauhan, allowing her to live with her husband Akbar Khan. Justice Jain passed the order on a habeas corpus petition Get the latest updates in Hyderabad City News , Technology , Entertainment , Sports , Politics and Top Stories on WhatsApp & Telegram by subscribing to our channels. You can also download our app for Android and iOS .
Cash-at-Varma-Residence Case: Fresh Plea For FIR Mentioned In SC
Lawyer Seeks Urgent Listing Of Plea Against Former Allahabad HC Judge
Professor Sangita Srivastava gets second term as vice-chancellor of Allahabad University
Don't force employees to wear Santa Claus cap: HC
The Allahabad High Court has ruled against compelling employees to wear Santa Claus red caps, stating such actions can hurt religious sentiments and are not permitted in India's democratic system. The court partly allowed a plea challenging criminal proceedings against an individual accused of forcing subordinates to wear the caps, clarifying how such cases should be treated under law.
Divorced woman can seek maintenance even if divorce was on ground of desertion: Allahabad HC
Back with husband Akbar after Allahabad HC verdict, Sonika says: Feels like Ive won a war
HC frees Ghaziabad woman from fathers custody, upholds choice of interfaith marriage
Village womans SHG turns into Rs 2.2 cr company
FIR against girls kin, cops after abduction accused dies by suicide at PS
Khaki uniform, ID badges must for e-rickshaw, e-auto drivers for Magh Mela 2027
Admin launches survey to regulate e-rickshaw routes
11K codeine syrup bottles, huge drug cache found in city house
Varanasi-Agra Vande Bharat likely to extend to Mathura soon
Fatehpur police bust inter-state burglars gang, 7 held
ABVP submits memorandum to AU admin seeking facility upgrades
Lakhimpur Kheri violence case: SC asks Allahabad HC CJ for report on allegations against trial judge
Advocate Prashant Bhushan alleges trial judge withdrew NDPS and SC/ST cases to himself; SC directs Uttar Pradesh to find senior public prosecutor for sessions trial
My Appeal To The Heritage Conscious People Of Lucknow And India
Lucknow is the city where I was born (though I grew up in Allahabad), so I have a special affinity for it. It too is a kind of Prayag, which, though having only one river, the Gomti, became renowned all over India for being the center of the Ganga-Jamni tehzeeb.
SC seeks report on Lakhimpur Kheri trial judge's conduct
The Supreme Court has requested a report from the Allahabad High Court Chief Justice regarding the conduct of the presiding officer in the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence case. This follows allegations by an eyewitness's advocate, Prashant Bhushan, that the officer improperly transferred cases, acquitted accused, and issued a non-bailable warrant against his ill client. The apex court also directed the Uttar Pradesh government to appoint an experienced public prosecutor for the trial.
Supreme Court dismisses plea against FAR granted to Great Value Realty's Ekanam project in Noida
The Supreme Court has dismissed a Special Leave Petition challenging additional Floor Area Ratio (FAR) granted to Great Value Realtys Ekanam project in Noida. By upholding the Allahabad High Courts rulingwhich verified that majority homeowner consents were properly obtainedthe apex court finalised the legal dispute. The decision allows Great Value Realty to proceed with developing three 46-storey ultra-luxury towers across 2 million square feet, with an estimated revenue potential of 3,000 crore.
Supreme Court seeks Allahabad High Court report on allegations against Lakhimpur Kheri trial judge
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court to examine allegations made by Advocate Prashant Bhushan against the trial judge hearing the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence case and submit a report in a sealed cover. A Bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi and [] The post Supreme Court seeks Allahabad High Court report on allegations against Lakhimpur Kheri trial judge appeared first on India Legal .
A Deputy Commandant with the Sashastra Seema Bal was removed from service after a woman told his department they were married and that he had hidden this while joining the force. The officer challenged the removal in the Allahabad High Court, saying no valid marriage had ever taken place and the claim was made only to pressure him. The Lucknow bench has now quashed the removal order and sent him back to duty, though the period he was out of service will count as no work, no pay.
The Allahabad High Court has warned a workplace against forcing employees to wear Santa Claus red caps, observing that such instructions could hurt the sentiments of people belonging to different faiths and disturb a peaceful and harmonious work environment. Justice Saurabh Srivastava made the observations while partly allowing a petition filed by Vikram Singh alias [] The post Allahabad High Court warns against forcing employees to wear Santa caps, says such instructions may hurt religious sentiments appeared first on India Legal .
Doctors cannot evade mandatory government service bond after subsidised PG education: Allahabad HC
The Court held that a mere administrative delay in providing a posting would not extinguish a doctors bond obligation, while faulting how a petitioner was denied counselling
A government employee whose appointment was disputed and services were ordered to be terminated in 2000 ultimately remained in service for nearly three decades. The Allahabad HC has now directed the UP government to calculate and release his pension, gratuity and other retirement benefits.
Allahabad HC orders probe into caste discrimination at Prayagraj NLU
The News Mill
Fire dept issues safety guidelines for firecrackers manufacturing units and shops
Abduction case: Dalit youth dies by suicide in police station restroom
Railways bars pvt agencies from inspecting critical safety parts
PCI Adds AI to B Pharm curriculum
NCR boosts safe drinking water measures across stns
Minister claim, sand-digging remarks give BJP ammunition against SPs Saroj
Extortion case: Atiqs son Ali records statement in Prayagraj court
HC orders probe into caste humiliation claims, bars NLU HOD-warden from duties
HC orders inquiry over claims of caste-based humiliation in NLU
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has ordered an independent inquiry against the head of the Department of Law and warden of the boys hostel at Dr Rajendra Prasad National Law University, Prayagraj over allegations of caste-based humiliation and discrimination raised by two students. Justice Vinod Diwakar also directed an independent re-evaluation of the answer sheets Get the latest updates in Hyderabad City News , Technology , Entertainment , Sports , Politics and Top Stories on WhatsApp & Telegram by subscribing to our channels. You can also download our app for Android and iOS .
Arya Samaj certificate alone no proof of Hindu marriage: HC
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that an Arya Samaj marriage certificate alone does not prove a valid Hindu marriage unless essential ceremonies under the Hindu Marriage Act are performed. This decision led to the reinstatement of an SSB officer who was dismissed for allegedly falsely declaring his marital status, as the court found no evidence of the required rituals in his disputed marriage.
Digital Desk | Prayagraj, Sep 21 (IANS) The Allahabad High Court has directed the constitution of two committees to independently re-evaluate answer sheets and inquire into allegations of caste-based humiliation and discrimination against students at Dr Rajendra Prasad National Law University, Prayagraj. A single-judge Bench of Justice Vinod Diwakar passed the directions while hearing a writ petition filed by a PhD research scholar and a fifth-semester B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) student of the university, who alleged that academic and administrative authority had been used by the Head of the Department of Law and Warden of the Boys' Hostel for caste-based humiliation and retaliation. The High Court directed the Vice-Chancellor to constitute an independent committee to re-evaluate the answer sheets of petitioner no. 2 in subjects taught and evaluated by respondent no. 6 (Dr Deepak Sharma), as well as any other subjects indicated by the student. It further directed that the answer sheets be placed before the committee after masking the identities of the candidate and original evaluator, without disclosing the marks originally awarded. The Committee shall complete the exercise and submit its report to the Vice-Chancellor within one week, the Allahabad High Court ordered, directing that the Vice-Chancellor place the report before it on the next date of hearing. For examining the allegations raised by the petitioners, the High Court asked Archana Singh-I, Judge, Small Cause Court, District Court, Prayagraj, and Arun Kumar Yadava, Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj, to conduct an inquiry and submit a report. The inquiry will examine whether students belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes were subjected to caste-based humiliation or discrimination by Dr Deepak Sharma or any other person employed by or working for gain in the university, and whether their complaints were dealt with in accordance with applicable regulations. The inquiring officers were authorised to record the statements of the petitioners and other persons, including Dr Sharma, and call for varsity records required for the inquiry. The Registrar of the university was directed to extend full cooperation. The High Court also directed that before recording any adverse conclusion against a person, the inquiring officers must communicate the substance of the allegations and provide a reasonable opportunity to explain. The inquiry report must record the substance of the explanation and any recommendations. It further directed the inquiring officers to take appropriate measures to protect the identities of students who depose before them, in view of the apprehension of retaliation expressed in the complaint filed on August 20. The report shall be submitted in a sealed cover before the next date of hearing, Justice Diwakar ordered. The High Court also directed the Vice-Chancellor to ensure that neither petitioner faces any adverse academic or administrative consequences on account of the proceedings or statements made during the inquiry. Until further orders, Dr Sharma will not be assigned any role in evaluating the answer scripts of petitioner no. 2 or in any disciplinary or hostel-related matter concerning either petitioner. The university was further directed to relieve the assistant professor concerned of all administrative responsibilities until the completion of the inquiries. The High Court also asked the Vice-Chancellor to file an affidavit stating whether the university had constituted an Equal Opportunity Cell and a committee for redressal of grievances of students belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, as required under applicable University Grants Commission (UGC) regulations. The affidavit must also disclose the composition of these bodies, the action taken on the complaint filed on August 20 and subsequent reminders, and the reasons for the apparent failure to act on the grievance. The Registrar was directed to file a personal affidavit addressing the same aspects. The petitioners had alleged that the university authorities failed to act on the complaint submitted by petitioner no. 2 to the Vice-Chancellor, despite repeated reminders and further complaints. The complaint, as reproduced in the High Court order, alleged that stricter evaluation of answer sheets was linked to the student's caste and referred to remarks allegedly made by Dr Sharma concerning caste and reservation. The student sought independent review or re-evaluation of the Constitutional Law-II and other answer scripts by an impartial evaluator, subject to university rules, while requesting confidentiality over the complaint due to apprehensions of retaliation and adverse consequences in the academic environment. The Allahabad High Court clarified that it had not recorded any finding on the truth of the allegations against Dr Sharma or any other person. The allegations are serious, and for that very reason they require to be examined by an impartial agency after affording a full opportunity of hearing to the person against whom they are made, the order observed. The High Court directed the Vice-Chancellor and Registrar to maintain strict confidentiality concerning the proceedings and disclose information only to persons necessary for compliance with the order. The matter has been posted for fresh hearing on September 24, at 12 noon.
Shravasti Family Court Counselor Recruitment 2026 - Apply Offline
Shravasti Family Court has released the Recruitment 2026 notification for 01 Counselor posts. The offline application process will be conducted from 19-09-2026 to 17-10-2026. Eligible candidates can apply through the official website, allahabadhighcourt.in.
Allahabad HC rejects heirs land plea after 22 years, says state took possession in 1992
The Allahabad high court dismissed a family's land restoration plea filed after twenty-two years. The court found the family had not challenged dispossession within a reasonable time. Proceedings under the Urban Land Ceiling Act were completed in 1992. The family failed to prove possession when the Repeal Act came into force. Unexplained delay meant the plea could not be considered by the court.
Traffic police crack whip on irregular parking at markets
56 kids participate in painting competition
16 criminals on police radar in Fatehpur
Prayagrajs famous samosas, rasgullas get ODOD boost for business expansion
52-day Magh Mela 2027 from Jan 14, Kalpwas to begin on Jan 22
Digital libraries in gram panchayats to help competitive exam aspirants in rural areas
Mahakaushal Distillery to start ethanol production by Nov
NCR to raise height of 55 platforms at 39 stations for safe boarding
602 flats to come up on Atiqs land; bookings likely around Diwali
Allahabad HC Orders Police Protection For Inter-Faith Same-Sex Couple
Court says lack of marital recognition does not permit anyone to threaten the dignity or physical safety of adult citizens.
HC directs UP Police to ensure safety of same-sex live-in couple
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Police to ensure the protection of an inter-faith same-sex couple in a live-in relationship, saying the lack of marital recognition does not give anyone the liberty to attack the dignity and physical safety of adult citizens. Justice Gautam Chowdhary said the couple has the freedom Get the latest updates in Hyderabad City News , Technology , Entertainment , Sports , Politics and Top Stories on WhatsApp & Telegram by subscribing to our channels. You can also download our app for Android and iOS .
Alld HC directs UP Police to protect interfaith lesbian couple in live-in relation
Over 1,000 revenue cases pending, commissioner orders pay freeze for tehsildar, 4 others
NISHAD Party to stay with NDA in 2027 UP polls: Minister
City traders oppose transaction fee on UPI payments above Rs 2,000
No rift in NDA, alliance will form govt in UP for third time: Anupriya Patel
Ganga Task Force leads cleanliness drive
Only 129 selected against 1,343 science teacher posts
Alld HC directs UP Police to protect interfaith lesbian couple
Fame & social media are just maya: Ranveer Allahabadia
Allahabad High Court has ordered SBI to refund Rs 19.9 lakh after the bank used a widows fixed deposit to recover her late husbands personal loan. The court also awarded Rs 1 lakh compensation, after finding that the woman was not a party to the loan and SBI had no legal basis to directly debit her account.
Allahabad HC adjourns Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah hearing till October 13
The News Mill
Spiritual gifting drives surge in sales of silver Hanuman Chalisa and Sunderkand
PMC approves land bank, fee hikes, reforms
Lakhpati Didis network expanding fast in Prayagraj dist
SP neither possesses a vision nor credible leadership: Maurya
2,297 candidates qualify for PCS-2025 interviews
Div commissioner orders immediate fixes for school sanitation gaps
Farrukhabad school video: CJP member moves Alld HC against FIR
HC adjourns Mathura case hearing till Oct 13
HC orders SBI to refund widow's Rs 19.90 lakh FD
The Allahabad High Court has ordered the State Bank of India (SBI) to refund Rs 19.90 lakh debited from a widow's fixed deposit to recover her deceased husband's personal loan. The court deemed the bank's action an abominable breach of banking practice and also directed SBI to pay Rs 1 lakh in compensation to the woman.
Allahabad HC strict on recording statements of witnesses, directs DGP
Allahabad High Court directed the UP DGP to consider making audio-video recording of witness statements mandatory.Allahabad HC directs DGP to record statements of witnesses (file photo)The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP) to consi...
Can you still enjoy ST status benefits after conversion? Learn the rules.
The Allahabad High Court clarified that changing religion does not erase tribal identity. Even after converting to Christianity or other religions, one will continue to receive the full benefits of ST reservations under the government.Allahabad High CourtThe Allahabad High Court ha...
Allahabad HC quashes rape case FIR against Congress MP Rakesh Rathore
The News Mill
Allahabad High Court Orders Mandatory Audio-Video Recording of Witness Statements
Nine SIs among 44 cops sent to lines for dereliction of duty
2 killed, 3 hurt in road accident
