CNMSports

Creating Jeopardy And Meaning Is Important: CA Chief Greenberg Backs Rethink Of Bilateral ODIs

Future Tours Programme: Cricket Australia chief executive Todd Greenberg has backed the ICCs push to give bilateral ODI cricket greater context and meaning, but warned that removing the format entirely from the Future Tours Programme could have significant financial consequences for cricket boards. Speaking in Darwin on Thursday during Australias first Test against Bangladesh, Greenberg revealed that Gupta had made similar comments during a recent visit to Melbourne and said he agreed with the underlying principle. I think the principle of his comments are that the games that are played need to matter and have context and jeopardy, Greenberg was quoted by Cricinfo as saying. We fundamentally believe that. But were also realists to know that bilateral ODIs make up a significant portion of our broadcast agreements, so weve got to find a way if were going to create more jeopardy and meaning, and were going to move them, what are we replacing them with, and how do you replace the revenues that go with those? So theres a fine balance here. Some of thats short term, some of it long term. But the principle of what hes saying is right. Creating jeopardy and meaning into the games we play is important. But its not an easy solve. Earlier Sanjog Gupta, CEO of the ICC, stated that the period of andomly scheduled bilateral series had to come to an end, as the future of ODI cricket was closely linked to meaningful competition and the World Cup. Greenberg is a member of the ICC working group which is responsible for finalising the Future Tours Programme for the 202831 cycle, the group also being looking at what a more extensive 203235 schedule might look like. The chief of the CA also supported Andrew McDonald, the Australia coach, in his request for bigger squad sizes for the ODI World Cup later this year. Since the tournament is being expanded, there are concerns regarding the demands placed on the players, and Greenberg stated that the CA had already brought the issue to the ICC. Weve advocated strongly, Greenberg said. Andrews made it pretty clear to me thats a position he wants to carry. So weve passed that feedback on to the ICC. So weve got some conversations scheduled with them, and I think theres a number of countries have said similar, given the change to it, that those squad sizes are important. So thats an issue on their table. Australia, on the other hand, did not advocate just as vigorously for an increased number of Associate teams to be included at the ODI World Cup after criticism had been received from Scotland and the Netherlands regarding the new format. Greenberg stated that the ICC had based its decision on commercial considerations. I dont know a lot of the background other than that was presented at the ICC conference, Greenberg said. I assume its just about trying to extract commercial value for those World Cups. And I saw some recent comments that some of the Associates are unhappy. I get that. Hopefully, theres a pathway for more Associates to look at the T20 World Cup as opposed to the ODI World Cup, so I think thats what the ICC is planning will be. Australia, on the other hand, did not advocate just as vigorously for an increased number of Associate teams to be included at the ODI World Cup after criticism had been received from Scotland and the Netherlands regarding the new format. Greenberg stated that the ICC had based its decision on commercial considerations. Also Read: Live Cricket Score Comments made by Greenberg come at a time when there is an ongoing debate regarding the future of ODI cricket, as the ICC is aiming to make sure the format stays relevant while the boards are hesitant about losing the broadcasting and commercial income earned from bilateral series. Article Source: IANS